No.BALAAM said:Is FBCH trying to sell the HAC campus or just a part of it? Does anyone know? I think they have some kind of vote tonight.
bgwilkinson said:No.BALAAM said:Is FBCH trying to sell the HAC campus or just a part of it? Does anyone know? I think they have some kind of vote tonight.
Tonight's vote is on accepting the terms of a five year note for 13.2 million.
This is the final part of our refinancing.
:The irony or it all!bgwilkinson said:No.BALAAM said:Is FBCH trying to sell the HAC campus or just a part of it? Does anyone know? I think they have some kind of vote tonight.
Tonight's vote is on accepting the terms of a five year note for 13.2 million.
This is the final part of our refinancing.
fishinnut said:bgwilkinson said:No.BALAAM said:Is FBCH trying to sell the HAC campus or just a part of it? Does anyone know? I think they have some kind of vote tonight.
Tonight's vote is on accepting the terms of a five year note for 13.2 million.
This is the final part of our refinancing.
:The irony or it all!
After all these years!
After all the millionaire friends & donors!
After all the Church Ed lectures on, "IF YOU DON"T HAVE IT------DON"T SPEND IT!
After all the criticism of Jerry at Liberty who left his school well into the black!
After all the staff members who worked there at low wages.
HAC still owes on that little campus! :
Correct, although it does not include unfunded liabilities, such as lifetime retirement at full salary for retired employees.sword said:So they have a total debt of 13.2 million on all the properties?
That does not sound too bad considering all the debt Schapp racked up.
As long as the staff all agree to work as long as the Colstens did, this seems like a very reasonable benefit.bgwilkinson said:Correct, although it does not include unfunded liabilities, such as lifetime retirement at full salary for retired employees.sword said:So they have a total debt of 13.2 million on all the properties?
That does not sound too bad considering all the debt Schapp racked up.
sword said:As long as the staff all agree to work as long as the Colstens did, this seems like a very reasonable benefit.bgwilkinson said:Correct, although it does not include unfunded liabilities, such as lifetime retirement at full salary for retired employees.sword said:So they have a total debt of 13.2 million on all the properties?
That does not sound too bad considering all the debt Schapp racked up.
That seems like a very silly statement.bgwilkinson said:sword said:As long as the staff all agree to work as long as the Colstens did, this seems like a very reasonable benefit.bgwilkinson said:Correct, although it does not include unfunded liabilities, such as lifetime retirement at full salary for retired employees.sword said:So they have a total debt of 13.2 million on all the properties?
That does not sound too bad considering all the debt Schapp racked up.
It was a reasonable benefit instituted by Bro. Schaap when we had millionaires giving us free money.
It is no longer reasonable or workable when it has to come out of the budget.
No organization can afford those kind of benefits if they don't have taxing authority and even taxing authorities can not provide the type of benefits we are now obligated to provide these former employees for as long as they live.
sword said:Many industries provide lifetime pensions at the 65 to 85% of base salary rate plus benefits. These industries include, banking, finance & insurance, mining, manufacturing, utilities, management, health providers, shipping & warehousing, energy, & technical & scientific services.
Do you think the church no longer owes the retirement benefits they promised it's long time employees just because they no longer have a healthy cash flow. Do you not get any retirement benefits from your former employer?
sword said:That seems like a very silly statement.bgwilkinson said:sword said:As long as the staff all agree to work as long as the Colstens did, this seems like a very reasonable benefit.bgwilkinson said:Correct, although it does not include unfunded liabilities, such as lifetime retirement at full salary for retired employees.sword said:So they have a total debt of 13.2 million on all the properties?
That does not sound too bad considering all the debt Schapp racked up.
It was a reasonable benefit instituted by Bro. Schaap when we had millionaires giving us free money.
It is no longer reasonable or workable when it has to come out of the budget.
No organization can afford those kind of benefits if they don't have taxing authority and even taxing authorities can not provide the type of benefits we are now obligated to provide these former employees for as long as they live.
Many industries provide lifetime pensions at the 65 to 85% of base salary rate plus benefits. These industries include, banking, finance & insurance, mining, manufacturing, utilities, management, health providers, shipping & warehousing, energy, & technical & scientific services.
Do you think the church no longer owes the retirement benefits they promised it's long time employees just because they no longer have a healthy cash flow. Do you not get any retirement benefits from your former employer?
Twisted said:sword said:Many industries provide lifetime pensions at the 65 to 85% of base salary rate plus benefits. These industries include, banking, finance & insurance, mining, manufacturing, utilities, management, health providers, shipping & warehousing, energy, & technical & scientific services.
Do you think the church no longer owes the retirement benefits they promised it's long time employees just because they no longer have a healthy cash flow. Do you not get any retirement benefits from your former employer?
I've never heard of this at FBCH, but would like to see the documents that explain the requirements to get such a retirement. If that were true, then there would be a fund that the church contributes to for retirees. Do they have such a fund? It would be a line item in the financials.
bgwilkinson said:By the way I still work about 50 hours a week currently in my consulting business.
This post I am in complete agreement with.bgwilkinson said:Sword said, "Many industries provide lifetime pensions at the 65 to 85% of base salary rate plus benefits. These industries include, banking, finance & insurance, mining, manufacturing, utilities, management, health providers, shipping & warehousing, energy, & technical & scientific services."sword said:That seems like a very silly statement.bgwilkinson said:It was a reasonable benefit instituted by Bro. Schaap when we had millionaires giving us free money.sword said:As long as the staff all agree to work as long as the Colstens did, this seems like a very reasonable benefit.bgwilkinson said:Correct, although it does not include unfunded liabilities, such as lifetime retirement at full salary for retired employees.sword said:So they have a total debt of 13.2 million on all the properties?
That does not sound too bad considering all the debt Schapp racked up.
It is no longer reasonable or workable when it has to come out of the budget.
No organization can afford those kind of benefits if they don't have taxing authority and even taxing authorities can not provide the type of benefits we are now obligated to provide these former employees for as long as they live.
Many industries provide lifetime pensions at the 65 to 85% of base salary rate plus benefits. These industries include, banking, finance & insurance, mining, manufacturing, utilities, management, health providers, shipping & warehousing, energy, & technical & scientific services.
Do you think the church no longer owes the retirement benefits they promised it's long time employees just because they no longer have a healthy cash flow. Do you not get any retirement benefits from your former employer?
Perhaps if we had built up to it with a plan to fund it, it would have made sense. We had no plan and we were not setting aside any funds to pay these benefits. A church is not just any industry and most spend every dime they take in as we did.
When we made the retirement plan we did not take into account that we might not continue to receive millions of dollars of free money every year into perpetuity, shame on us. After all we were accustomed to receiving free money for many decades.
At this point the funding of current benefits takes a substantial part of our budget. This is only for those who have previously retired. We are not currently offering any retirement plan for anyone in the future.
Sword said, "Do you think the church no longer owes the retirement benefits they promised it's long time employees just because they no longer have a healthy cash flow. Do you not get any retirement benefits from your former employer?"
I think I made myself clear by the statement, "..can not provide the type of benefits we are now obligated to provide these former employees for as long as they live."
I have been a business owner for about 50 years, so no my employer does not provide any retirement benefits. By the way I still work about 50 hours a week currently in my consulting business.
sword said:Surely you have been funding a 401K, IRA or SEP plan for yourself. I can not imagine someone trying to retire on SS alone. Do you think churches should plan & budget for their staffs retirement or "Let God provide". I think all churches with full time staff should budget to "Match" funds for a 401k for their staff.