Two savages, who are masquerading as doctors, have written a paper which is published in the Australian Journal of Medical Ethics. This is their conclusion about after birth abortion:
If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/03/infanticide_on_demand.html#ixzz1nwEalul3
If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/03/infanticide_on_demand.html#ixzz1nwEalul3