Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching was NOT created by Darby

Biblebeliever

New member
Elect
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
892
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hello everyone, I just wanted to share this post with you all to show you that Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching was not a modern invention by Darby and Scofield. I realize that more and more people are coming out with this silly notion, idea, and claim that Dispensationalism was not taught before the time of John Nelson Darby. And because a lot of people don't do their own research and study into the matter, a lot of them end up believing the false claim that Dispensationalism wasn't around before the 1800s.

So the purpose of this post is to simply show you that Dispensational Bible Teaching was around long before the 1800s. In fact, your going to find that it was even around in the Second Century.

So to begin; here are some of the Dispensation Systems and layouts which were developed way before Darby was even born:


William Gouge who was born in 1575, developed the following the follwing 6 Dispensations Layout: Adam to Noah; Noah to Abraham; Abraham to David; David to the Captivity; the Captivity to the Birth of Christ; the Birth of Christ to the Great White Throne Judgment. Now what should be pointed out is that Gouge's system left out the Mosaic Covenant. And in regard to Gouge's layout, Dr. Peter Ruckman pointed out that his layout ended up "spiritualizing three-fourths of the Old Testament, teaching no restoration of Israel, and no Millennial Reign." (Ruckman, How To Teach Dispensational Truth, Pg.6)


Another Dispensational System and layout that was given before John Nelson Darby's time was that of Pierre Poiret (1646-1719). And Poiret gave a Premillennial System. He gave the following Dispensational System by describing the following: "The Oeconomy of the Creation; the Oeconomy of Sin; the Oeconomy of the Restoration; the Oeconomy of the Incarnation; the Oeconomy of the Cooperation of Man with the Operation of God, and the Oeconomy of Universal Providence. And Poiret's seventh Dispensation was a physical, literal, one thousand year reign of Jesus Christ (according to Arnold Ehlert; in his work, A Bibliographic History of Dispensationalism [ Grand Rapids: Baker book House, 1965], p. 35).

So to sum up Poiret's Dispensational System, he had Seven Dispensations in Six volumes.


Isaac Watts (1674-1748) also discerned that there were Divisions and Dispensations in the Holy Bible, and this was his Dispensational Set up: "The Dispensation of Innocency; The Dispensation of the Covenant of Grace; The Noahical Dispensation; The Abrahamical Dispensation, The Mosaical Dispensation, and the Christian Dispensation. Now what should be obvious to point out though, Mr. Watts did miss the Davidic Covenant. Plus, he also missed the Pre-tribulation Rapture, the Tribulation (Time of Jacob's Trouble), the Restoration of Israel, and the Millennium.


And here are some more Dispensational Systems which have been developed and worked out long before John Nelson Darby's time (1800 - 1882).


John Taylor of Norwich (1694-1751), John Flechiere (1729-1785), John Priestley (1733-1804), David Bogue ( 1750-1825), Adam Clarke (1762-1832), George Faber (1773-1843), and David Russell (1779-1848).


And all these Dispensatuional Systems were worked out before John Darby, C.I. Scofied (1843-1921), and Clarence Larkin (1850-1924).


So contrary to the popular misteaching that Dispensational Bible study and Teaching was somehow first developed by Darby, the quite opposite is the truth. And the simple truth of the matter is that Dispensational Bible Study has been around for a very long time. And while Darby, Scofield, and Larkin all did a great work in the study of Dispensational Bible Study; and while they with their books and other works have surely contributed greatly to this unique and Biblical system and method of Bible Study, these three men were by no means the first to discover different ages and dispensations in God's holy word.


According to Crutchfield, Justin Martyr (AD 100-165), believed in four phases of human history in God's program.


First phase was from Adam to Abraham
Second Phase was from Abraham to Moses
The Third was from Moses to Christ
And the Fourth was from Christ to the Eternal State (Eternity).


Alongside Justin Martyr was Irenaeus (AD120-202), and his Dispensational Theme went like this:


1. From the Creation to the Flood.
2. From the Flood to the Law.
3. From the Law to the Gospel.
4. From the Gospel to the Eternal State.


So Irenaeus's Dispensational layout was quite similar to Justin Martyr's in that both of their Dispensational layouts had four ages or dispensations to them.


Furthermore, Irenaeus taught that there were four zones of the world and of mankind. He saw a connection between the four zones, the faces of the four living creatures, the four gospels, and the four dispensations.


And to conclude, I will include here a quote by Crutchfield in a study he did in regard to the very early Dispensational Layouts of Martyr and Irenaeus in comparison to the modern Dispensational Systems:


"Some Fathers set forth only four such dispensations, others came very close to making nearly the same divisions modern dispensationalists do, Irenaeus, Victorinus of Petau, and Methodius' number of dispensations is artificially restricted to four ... the dispensations are most often spoken of the early fathers in terms of the prominent persons (Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Christ). Dispensational divisions were customarily made along the boundaries of these five men's lives and times." - Crutchfiled concludes in his own study on the history of Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching.


So again, don't believe the false statement that Dispensationalsm only recently came about by Darby and Larkin. This falsehood and lie is continually made by those who simply refuse to be dispensational and who refuse to obey the command given in 2 Timothy 2:15. Hence, false prophets like Steven Anderson who fails to rightly divide the word of truth, are constantly attacking the Biblical system of Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching.



And for those of you out there who are interested in taking a look into Dispensational Bible Teaching and Study, I recommend Larkin's book: Dispensational Truth, Dr. Doug Stauffer's One Book Rightly Divided, and also Dr. Peter Ruckman's book: How To Tach Dispensational Truth.

There is also a wealth of good sermons out there on Dispensational Truth that you can find simply by going onwww.Sermonaudio.com

Bryan Denlinger does a couple of sermons on this subject, as does Gregory A. Miller, Alan Cairns, and Elder Ronald Lawrence. I highly recommend all of them.

Well everyone, I hope this helped. And please prayerfully consider in studying this matter. It is so important for students of the Bible to learn how to rightly divide the word of truth. To learn how to discover the ages and different dispensations in the Holy Scriptures. The different Dispensations which God has clearly placed in His word. And to acknowledge that those divisions, ages, and dispensations are there.
 
Biblebeliever said:
Hello everyone, I just wanted to share this post with you all to show you that Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching was not a modern invention by Darby and Scofield.

More to the point, it wasn't an invention of Jesus or the apostles, either.
 
Ransom said:
Biblebeliever said:
Hello everyone, I just wanted to share this post with you all to show you that Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching was not a modern invention by Darby and Scofield.

More to the point, it wasn't an invention of Jesus or the apostles, either.

Scott, who arthored 2 Timothy 2:15?
 
Ransom said:
Biblebeliever said:
Hello everyone, I just wanted to share this post with you all to show you that Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching was not a modern invention by Darby and Scofield.

More to the point, it wasn't an invention of Jesus or the apostles, either.
I don't get to Amen you often, so I jump on the opportunity.  Xactly!

Anishinabe

 
Biblebeliever said:
Ransom said:
Biblebeliever said:
Hello everyone, I just wanted to share this post with you all to show you that Dispensational Bible Study and Teaching was not a modern invention by Darby and Scofield.

More to the point, it wasn't an invention of Jesus or the apostles, either.

Scott, who arthored 2 Timothy 2:15?

I'm not Ransom, but...


Paul. But even so, you would have to prove from the context of that verse it meant the 66-book canon you now have instead of the canon to which Paul was referring at the time. Then you would have to prove that Paul was referencing dispensational theology which would be deemed "inspired".
 
Just because someone believes in historically "different times"... doesn't mean they are "Dispensationalists". Dispensationalists have taken Eph 1:10 and destroyed its meaning. Dispensationalism is the silliest Systematic Theology ever produced. Take it from an ex dispensationalist. :)

I can't take any hard core Dispenstationalist seriously. I do know a few wise men that mix some Dispensationalism and New Covenant Theology.... but a hard core Dispensationalist?????

There are as many flavors of Dispensationalism as there are toilet paper brands. In the end, they pretty much good for the same thing. ;)
 
Izdaari said:
Well, I do enjoy Scofield's notes... but mainly for the contrast.  :-*

Scofield had some good notes. He had some bad notes. He did make you think.
 
christundivided said:
Izdaari said:
Well, I do enjoy Scofield's notes... but mainly for the contrast.  :-*

Scofield had some good notes. He had some bad notes. He did make you think.

That's what I like about him. He gives a different perspective, which is usually thought-provoking. Though sometimes the thought is "what kind of drugs was he on?".
 
Biblebeliever said:
Scott, who arthored 2 Timothy 2:15?

God did. But don't tell me that "rightly dividing" means "dividing Scripture up into dispensations." Literally, it means "cutting straightly" - the picture is of someone plowing neat, straight furrows through a field. It means handling the word of God correctly.

Ironically, those who say that "rightly dividing" means Dispensationalism, are not "rightly dividing."
 
It's odd how well many of those examples you provided lined right up with covenant theology....
 
Frankly it does not matter, to me,  what is dispensationalism or covenant theology. There is not problem for me with concept of the former or finding it in scripture. Simply, the greek word for dispensation is oikonomia from which we get  the transliteration "economy".  God gives a further revelation and there is a new economy to obey and or fulfill His new revelation. As to the specifics as to the where and when each started and transitions between such economies; I'll leave that to the theologs  to fight about.  Much quackery has been hatched out of hyper-dispensationalism such as Ruckmanism etc. 
 
Back
Top