Biblical New Testimate canon

[Timothy]

Does the Old Testament ever promise a New Testament canon? How certain are we that the selection of New Testimate books is a final authority?

 

[ALAYMAN]

Depends on whether you're asking a Catholic, Tomato, Coffee Sniffer, or Christian/Fundamentalist.

 

[Timothy]

Depends on whether you're asking a Catholic, Tomato, Coffee Sniffer, or Christian/Fundamentalist.

I choose #4

 

[christundivided]

Depends on whether you're asking a Catholic, Tomato, Coffee Sniffer, or Christian/Fundamentalist.

I choose #4

Not all fundamentalists accept the same canon.

The answer to your question is NO. Yet, just because there is no clear definitive promise.... doesn't mean it wasn't part of God's divine plan to include it.

 

[Timothy]

Depends on whether you're asking a Catholic, Tomato, Coffee Sniffer, or Christian/Fundamentalist.

I choose #4

Not all fundamentalists accept the same canon.

The answer to your question is NO. Yet, just because there is no clear definitive promise.... doesn't mean it wasn't part of God's divine plan to include it.

Couldn't the same be said regarding the King James translation being a final English translation?

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

Depends on whether you're asking a Catholic, Tomato, Coffee Sniffer, or Christian/Fundamentalist.

I choose #4

Not all fundamentalists accept the same canon.

The answer to your question is NO. Yet, just because there is no clear definitive promise.... doesn't mean it wasn't part of God's divine plan to include it.

Couldn't the same be said regarding the King James translation being a final English translation?

The lengths to which you will go to justify KJVO is an inspiration to everyone who likes to rationalize a justification for their views. 

 

[Ransom]

The lengths to which you will go to justify KJVO is an inspiration to everyone who likes to rationalize a justification for their views.

A "testimate," even!

 

[christundivided]

Depends on whether you're asking a Catholic, Tomato, Coffee Sniffer, or Christian/Fundamentalist.

I choose #4

Not all fundamentalists accept the same canon.

The answer to your question is NO. Yet, just because there is no clear definitive promise.... doesn't mean it wasn't part of God's divine plan to include it.

Couldn't the same be said regarding the King James translation being a final English translation?

All you have is what is.... you must simply judge what exists.

Its silly to say the lack of promise of a NT is same thing as the KJV being the final English translation.

 

[Ransom]

Couldn't the same be said regarding the King James translation being a final English translation?

No. You can't argue that silence regarding X is evidence for X.

 

[AmazedbyGrace]

OT told of a coming Savior. The NT documents when He arrived, the fulfillment of that promise. Of course such an even would be documented.

The Scriptures never foretold of a Bible that would be translated into only one modern language, which should be held as supreme above all other translations.

So why not just accept the Mormon burning bosom thing while you are at it?