Search results

The verses that you cite do not state nor teach modern, human KJV-only reasoning/teaching. Peter Ruckman now tries to claim that scripture in 2 Timothy 3:16 includes Bible translations, but then he seems to ignore or avoid the "all." According to his new private KJV-only interpretation of 2...

Perhaps you should take your own advice. You keep trying to defend erroneous, human KJV-only reasoning which involves the use of fallacies [false arguments].

The posts of KJV-only advocates may suggest that they have no final authority greater than their own subjective, biased, non-scriptural opinions.

Dean John William Burgon as edited by Edward Miller maintained that “the influence of Origen may be traced” in some passages and one example listed is “in the substitution of Bethabara for Bethany (John 1:28)” (Green, Unholy Hands, I, p. 91). John William Burgon wrote: “It is not a little...

Origen had some influence on the Textus Receptus by means of Erasmus. Erasmus quoted from Origen in his Annotations in defense of some of his textual decisions. Peter Ruckman even acknowledged that the hero of Erasmus was Origen (King James Onlyism, p. 10). Irena Backus observed that...

KJV-only advocates are the ones doing that. KJV-only advocates attempt to read into verses their own preconceived human KJV-only ideas that are not stated in the verses. KJV-only advocates avoid some clear scriptural truths. They will disobey scriptural commands in order to attack...

Jesus answered a question with another question.

Clyde Pilkington, Jr., who says that he was the author of "the King James Bible Song" and that he taught classes and seminars in support of the KJV, has written a book in which he apologizes "for the pride and bondage that can be found" in his former KJV-only position (p. 11). His 2010 book is...

You do not describe those whom you incorrectly accuse. Instead you describe yourself and KJV-only advocates. You have refused to see and understand sound evidence to the contrary of your incorrect claims. You close your eyes to clear scriptural truths that would be a serious problem for your...

Your question applying another poster's incorrect reasoning justly would make good sense to thinking believers. KJV-only advocates seek to dodge and dismiss your valid question.

Your tactics could be considered to involve use of the fallacy of false dilemma as you indicate an incorrect attempt to attack and smear "new versions" so that you incorrectly assume and suggest that the only alternative or other choice would be the KJV. Your unproven premise or claim that the...

It is how you avoid actual verifiable facts in contrast to your unproven subjective opinions.

You have it wrong. It is KJV-only advocates who try their hand at mental gymnastics to avoid acknowledging their unproven premises that involve the use of fallacies and to avoid admitting the clear KJV-only use of unjust divers measures [double standards].

That is your biased, incorrect opinion. Perhaps you cherry-pick a few examples, and assume too much from too little.

I did not claim that you argued that the KJV is perfect. You have not proved your claim that the KJV is "the most accurate English translation" to be true. You have not proven the KJV to be the best authority that we have in the English language. You can choose to assume your subjective...

Actually your conclusion does not necessarily follow. Does your conclusion actually take into consideration the different contexts or do you take the verses out of context? Would you try to suggest that dividing sheep from goats is supposedly the same exact thing as dividing sheep from...

If readers' eyes are open, it should be obvious that KJV-only posters in effect do support non-scriptural or extra-Biblical doctrine as they try to add to the scriptures claims that the scriptures do not directly state nor teach. KJV-only posters have not demonstrated from the Scriptures...

Is it surprising that a KJV-only poster would try to suggest that applying scriptural truth consistently and justly would supposedly be "lunatic logic"?

This shows how KJV-only posters try to add or change what other posters state in order to try to make it into something that they did not say. You show that you do not get nor understand the truth. Just because the original autographs of Scripture are not known to exist on the earth does not...

According to the Scriptures themselves, it could be soundly concluded that inspiration would be a term for the way, method, or process by which God directly gave the Scriptures to the prophets and apostles or for the way that the words proceeded from the mouth of God to the prophets and apostles...