Search results

It is seen all the time with KJV-only posters who wish to remain blind to some scriptural truths and many verifiable facts and who wish to remain blind to KJV-only reasoning's dependence upon fallacies and upon use of unjust divers measures [double standards]. Are you blind to the errors in...

It is clear that you have it wrong and mostly backwards. The smear campaign often comes from those who are KJV-only advocates, and they are the ones using fallacies including red herrings, the ones ignoring the actual sound evidence, the ones showing partiality to one exclusive group of Church...

You are mixed up or are trying to rewrite history. The Puritans were all still members of the Church of England, and they wanted to purify the Church of England of some of its remaining Roman Catholic practices. The Separatists were not members of the Church of England since they choose to...

The claimed credentials of the Church of England makers of the KJV may seem very impressive, but their scholarship was still limited and imperfect. Human scholarship does not result in perfection. The KJV translators were primarily Latin scholars first, and they often translated through the...

You fail to practice what you preach since you do not demonstrate from the Bible that it clearly teaches your human KJV-only reasoning/teaching. As soundly noted before, you present no positive, clear, consistent, sound, just, true, scriptural case for modern KJV-only teaching. KJV-onlyism in...

Perhaps it is impossible to get KJV-only advocates to be consistent, reasonable, sound, just, and scriptural in their position concerning Bible translations. It is sound and reasonable to ask that assertions made by KJV-only folks be applied consistently and justly.

The video would not play. Does the video suggest that Ruckmanism is unsound and wrong if it needed reformed? Believers should start with what the Scriptures state and teach instead of wasting time trying to reform human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning.

Gail Riplinger wrote: “The Geneva text is almost identical to the KJV” (In Awe of thy Word, p. 566). Riplinger asserted that “generally speaking, the early English Bibles are the same” (p. 130; Hidden History, p. 37). Riplinger asserted that “the words that differ in the early English Bibles...

You may like the statement, but that does not mean that the statement is true. There are other English Bible translations that are based on the same original-language manuscript copies as the KJV is. It has not been demonstrated that the Church of England makers of the KJV were actually...

Gail Riplinger maintained that the earlier English Bibles such as Tyndale's and the Geneva are "practically identical to the KJV" (Language of the KJB, p. 5). Riplinger also wrote: “The Geneva text is almost identical to the KJV” (In Awe of thy Word, p. 566). Riplinger asserted that “generally...

It should be accurately identified as a KJV-only conference. The Bible including as translated in the KJV does not actual state nor teach the human, non-scriptural KJV-only view that will likely be advocated at this conference. The speakers may appeal to some scriptural truths, but they...

While off-topic for this thread, you will claim to prove things that you do not actually prove to be true. You avoid and ignore some of the historical facts concerning the Church of England's doctrinal views leading up to 1611. Are you unaware that the Puritans were Calvinists so that any...

Non-scriptural, human KJV-only reasoning/teaching is a perversion of true Bible doctrines concerning the Scriptures.

Doug Stauffer asked: ""Does your version reduce Jesus to God's servant rather than His Son in Acts 3:13, 3:26, 4:27, or 4:30" (One Book Stands, p. 297)? This same Greek word found at Acts 4:27 and 30 was also used of Jesus at Matthew 12:18a where it was translated "servant" in the KJV...

Like many other KJV-only authors, Doug Stauffer uses different measures/standards [double standards] in making his inconsistent, unjust allegations against the NKJV than he would apply to the textual criticism decisions and translation decisions involved in the making of the KJV. Doug...

The Scriptures are the specific revealed, written words of God given by the miracle of inspiration to the prophets and apostles. According to the Scriptures, God revealed His Word to the prophets and apostles by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 3:5, 2 Pet. 1:21, 2 Pet. 3:1-2, Rom. 15:4, 1 Cor. 2:10-13...

You assume and believe an unscriptural, human opinion of men. You have presented no positive, clear, sound, scriptural case for your opinion. The Scriptures including as translated in the KJV do not state that the KJV is given by inspiration of God. 2 Timothy 3:16 refers to the giving of...

I have already clearly stated where the Scriptures are so your question was pointless. In agreement with the early English Bible translators including the KJV translators, the existing, preserved Scriptures in the original languages are the proper standard and greater authority for the making...

Typical that KJV-only posters return to their bogus "loser" deceitful misrepresentation and smear tactics as they improperly try to put words in the mouths of Bible-believers that they do not say. You are the one who tries to demand that others accept blindly your subjective opinions that...

Perhaps you again describe you yourself. It is KJV-only posters who may display a victim mentality response when their unproven subjective KJV-only opinions are not blindly accepted and when they do not get their way.